34
I dropped $400 on a 'smart' cable tester that ended up being useless on real jobs
Everyone in my area was hyping up the ConnectPro X5 tester last year, saying it would cut my fault-finding time in half. I saved up and bought one, thinking it would be a game changer for those tricky old apartment buildings. The thing is, it only works perfectly on brand new, clean lines with no splices. The second you hit a corroded barrel connector or a bad wall plate it just gives you a confusing error code. I wasted a whole afternoon in a 70s split-level trying to get a reading, then just went back to my old toner and probe and found the break in 10 minutes. That $400 could have bought a great set of new fish tapes or a better ladder. Has anyone else found that the fancy gear just doesn't hold up in the real world? What's your go-to for finding faults in old wiring?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
mary3091mo ago
Used to think those testers were the future... until a real job proved me wrong.
9
robertb701mo ago
My first dev job at a small startup showed me the same thing. Real projects just need different tools.
3
jordan30513d ago
Yeah, that part about it only working on clean lines hits hard. People forget that the real world is messy. The problem is those testers are built by engineers in a lab who assume perfect conditions. They never had to crawl through a dusty attic with 30 year old wiring. My take is the simpler the tool, the less it can get confused by real world junk. A basic toner doesn't care about corrosion, it just finds the tone.
2