Am I the only one who thinks the moon landing fakes still have some decent points?
I was talking to this older guy at the diner in Cleveland last month, and he pulled out a stack of old photos from the Apollo missions. He pointed out how the shadows in the shots don't line up right, like multiple light sources instead of just the sun. I told him it's usually explained by uneven ground or camera angles, but he just laughed and said 'you believe what they printed in the textbooks.' That interaction stuck with me because he wasn't shouting or being rude, he just calmly showed his evidence and let me sit with it. I've looked up the shadow thing since then and found some NASA explanations that sort of make sense, but not perfectly. Makes you wonder if there's more to those old photos than we give credit for. Has anyone else run into someone who laid out a solid case without getting all crazy about it?